U.S. v. Iroegbulem, 15 CR 52. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20160318670
Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2016
Summary: PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER THOMAS M. DURKIN , District Judge . Upon the motion of the unopposed motion of the government for a protective order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3509 with respect to the rights of the victim in this case, it is hereby ordered as follows: 1. During the trial in this matter, the parties shall identify the minor victims only by their first names; 2. Any trial exhibits shall be redacted to refer only to the victims' first names and to protect any other identifying infor
Summary: PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER THOMAS M. DURKIN , District Judge . Upon the motion of the unopposed motion of the government for a protective order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3509 with respect to the rights of the victim in this case, it is hereby ordered as follows: 1. During the trial in this matter, the parties shall identify the minor victims only by their first names; 2. Any trial exhibits shall be redacted to refer only to the victims' first names and to protect any other identifying inform..
More
PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER
THOMAS M. DURKIN, District Judge.
Upon the motion of the unopposed motion of the government for a protective order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3509 with respect to the rights of the victim in this case, it is hereby ordered as follows:
1. During the trial in this matter, the parties shall identify the minor victims only by their first names;
2. Any trial exhibits shall be redacted to refer only to the victims' first names and to protect any other identifying information except for the years of their birth; and
3. Parties shall file, under seal, any original, unredacted exhibits containing the victims' full names and any other identifying information previously redacted from publicly available trial exhibits.
Source: Leagle