Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Chicago Area Joint Welfare Committee for the Pointing, Cleaning and Caulking Industry, Local 52 v. Algozine Masonry Restoration, Inc., 14 C 5953. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois Number: infdco20160519835 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 13, 2016
Latest Update: May 13, 2016
Summary: PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ENFORCE THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ENTER JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT AND DAVID ALGOZINE GARY FEINERMAN , District Judge . NOW COME Plaintiffs, CHICAGO AREA JOINT WELFARE COMMITTEE FOR THE POINTING, CLEANING AND CAULKING INDUSTRY, LOCAL 52, et al. (hereafter referred to as "Plaintiffs" or "Funds"), by their attorneys, and move the Court for the entry of an order enforcing the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties. In support
More

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ENFORCE THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ENTER JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT AND DAVID ALGOZINE

NOW COME Plaintiffs, CHICAGO AREA JOINT WELFARE COMMITTEE FOR THE POINTING, CLEANING AND CAULKING INDUSTRY, LOCAL 52, et al. (hereafter referred to as "Plaintiffs" or "Funds"), by their attorneys, and move the Court for the entry of an order enforcing the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties. In support of the Motion, Plaintiffs state as follows:

1. On January 26, 2016, the Funds filed a motion to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties due to Defendant's failure to submit any installments due under the payment plan and its failure to timely submit its reports and contributions due thereon as required under the collective bargaining agreement and the Settlement Agreement. On May 10, 2016, the Court denied the Funds' motion to enforce finding that the settlement agreement did not become effective until December 11, 2015 and that the Funds had not presented evidence of Defendant's breach of the settlement agreement. Below is the Funds' renewed motion to enforce the settlement agreement entered into between the parties and supporting affidavit from the Funds' Administrative Manager, Terry M. Rocco.

2. This action was originally brought by the Plaintiffs, the Trustees of the jointly-administered, labor-management employee benefit plans collectively known as the Tuckpointers Local 52 Fringe Benefit Funds, alleging, inter alia, that Defendant breached its obligations under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement it is a party to with the Administrative District Council 1 of Illinois of the International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craft Workers, AFL-CIO, and the Agreements and Declarations of Trust under which the Plaintiff Funds are maintained. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that Defendant failed to remit payment of contributions for work performed on its behalf by beneficiaries of the Plaintiff Funds. The Complaint was brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§1132, 1145.

3. On November 12, 2015, the Defendant and David Algozine executed a Settlement Agreement, which was then executed on behalf of Plaintiff Funds on December 1, 2015, incorporating the terms for settlement agreed to by the parties (a copy of the Settlement Agreement is attached hereto).

4. Defendant and David Algozine agreed that they owed the total amount of $520,795.80 for contributions for October 2014 through July 2015, contributions due pursuant to an audit conducted for the time period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013, liquidated damages for October 2013 through July 2013, interest due pursuant to the audit, and attorneys' fees and costs incurred for the time period May 6, 2014 through September 30, 2015, as described in the Settlement Agreement.

5. Defendant and David Algozine also agreed to remain current with the regular submission of monthly reports and contributions due thereon throughout the course of the payment schedule.

6. Defendant and David Algozine agreed to make payment to Plaintiffs of $520,795.80, by way of the Payment Schedule set forth in Schedule A attached to the Settlement Agreement.

7. The Settlement Agreement provides that in the event Defendant and David Algozine fails to timely submit the monthly installment so that it is received by the first of the month or fails to timely submit its monthly reports and contributions which are due on the 20th day of the following month, the Defendant and David Algozine shall have seven (7) days in which to cure its default. Accordingly, if Defendant's and David Algozine's monthly installment is not received by the 8th of the month and/or the monthly reports and contributions are not received by the Fund Office for the Plaintiff Funds on the 27th of each month, Defendant and David Algozine will be considered in breach of the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Defendant and David Algozine shall further be considered a breach of the Settlement Agreement if they exercise their rights to cure a default for more than three (3) consecutive months.

8. Upon breach of the Settlement Agreement, any payments remaining due under Schedule A shall become immediately due. Algozine and David Algozine, individually, agree to allow this Court to enter judgment against Algozine and David Algozine, individually, upon a Motion by the Funds to enforce the Settlement Agreement with its only defense being that a payment of the balance due, plus the additional attorneys' fees and costs the Funds may incur to enforce this Agreement and/or collect the balance due and owing.

9. Defendant previously argued that the Settlement Agreement did not become effective until it was in receipt of a fully executed copy on December 11, 2015. Defendant essentially argued that it was not in breach of the Settlement Agreement when the Funds' filed the initial motion to enforce because Defendant believed the payment schedule should be adjusted to reflect that the first installment would be due January 1, 2016. However, Defendant did not submit any installments that it intended to be applied to the Settlement Agreement until the last week of January. See, Affidavit of Terry Rocco ¶10. Accordingly, Defendant was not in compliance when the Funds filed the initial motion to enforce.

10. Furthermore, while Defendant submitted a series of four payments during the period of January 25, 2016 through February 2, 2016 totaling $74,000.00 which were meant to be installments 1 and 2 under Schedule A of the Settlement Agreement, Defendant has not submitted any other payments to the Funds since February 2, 2016. See, Rocco Aff. ¶¶10 & 11. Accordingly, even if the payment schedule were adjusted to reflect a starting date of January 1, 2016, Defendant's installments due for March 1, 2016, April 1, 2016 and May 1, 2016 remain delinquent. id.

11. Outside of the payment plan, Defendant submitted monthly contribution reports to the Plaintiffs identifying employees of the Defendant who performed work covered by the collective bargaining agreement, and the number of hours worked by or paid to those employees for the months of August 2015 through February 2016. See, Rocco Aff. ¶12. Said monthly contribution reports establish that Defendant owes the Plaintiffs the amount of $332,993.88 for contributions and $66,598.77 for liquidated damages, for a total of $399,592.65. id. After applying contributions received for August 2015 through December 2015 totaling $314,710.18, there remains a balance of $18,283.70 in contributions due for January and February 2016 and $66,598.77 in liquidated damages due for August 2015 through February 2016. id.

12. Courts may "enforce settlement agreements reached in litigation pending before them." Debose v. Mueller, 552 F.Supp. 307, 308 (N.D. Ill. 1982). Furthermore, settlement agreements are contracts and enforced according to local contract law. Williams v. Tucker, 2013 U.S. Dist LEXIS 90974, *7 (N.D. Ill. 2013). While the parties disagree as to when the Settlement Agreement became effective, there is no dispute that the parties entered into a binding Settlement Agreement that remains in effect. Furthermore, it is undisputed that Defendant is currently in breach of the Settlement Agreement since it failed to submit any installments due on March 1, 2016, April 1, 2016 and May 1, 2016; failed to timely submit its monthly contribution reports and contributions due thereon as evidenced by the contributions currently delinquent in the amount of $18,283.70 for January and February 2016 and the delinquent report and contributions due thereon for March 2016 which was due on April 20, 2016, but has not been submitted to the Funds. See, Rocco Aff. ¶¶10-13. Accordingly, Defendant's only defense under the terms of the Settlement Agreement is the payment of the full balance due.

For all the reasons stated, the Plaintiffs hereby move the Court for the entry of an Order enforcing the terms of the Settlement Agreement and entering judgment against Defendant, Algozine Masonry Restoration, Inc. and David Algozine, individually. Specifically, Plaintiffs request:

A. That judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant, Algozine Masonry Restoration, Inc. and David Algozine, individually, to include the amount of $453,091.38, being the total amount remaining due for contributions, liquidated damages, interest and attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. B. That judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant, Algozine Masonry Restoration, Inc. and David Algozine, individually, to include the amount of $84,882.47, being the total amount due for contributions and liquidated damages for the time period August 2015 through February 2016. C. That judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant, Algozine Masonry Restoration, Inc. and David Algozine, individually, to include $7,486.00 in attorneys' fees incurred by the Plaintiffs from October 1, 2015 through April 30, 2016. D. That Plaintiffs have such further relief as may be deemed just and equitable by the Court.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

This Settlement Agreement (hereinafter, "Agreement") is made and entered into this ___ day of October 2015, by and between the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned action, Chicago Area Joint Welfare Committee for the Pointing, Cleaning and Caulking Industry, Local 52, et al., (hereafter referred to as the "Funds") and Defendant, Algozine Masonry Restoration, Inc. (hereafter referred to as "Algozine") and ____________, individually, to resolve the Funds' claims in the above-captioned case.

WHEREAS, Algozine has at all relevant times been bound to a collective bargaining agreement obligating it to report and pay monthly contributions to the Funds at the rates specified therein on behalf of its bargaining unit employees; and

WHEREAS, based on monthly contribution prepared by Algozine for the months of October 2014 through July 2015, Algozine owes the Funds contributions in the amount of $288,116.05; and

WHEREAS, based on monthly reports prepared by Algozine, but untimely submitted for the months of October 2013 through July 2015, Algozine owes the Funds liquidated damages in the amount of $168,024.72; and

WHEREAS, the Funds caused a payroll compliance review to be conducted on Algozine's books and records covering the period of January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013, which identified underpaid contributions due on behalf of Algozine's employees who performed bargaining unit work along with liquidated damages and interest incurred by the Funds; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to audit disputes submitted by Algozine and accepted by the Funds' Trustees, the audit findings were revised and Algozine owes contributions due on behalf of Algozine's employees in the amount of $43,552.70, liquidated damages in the amount of $4,355.27 and interest in the amount of $2,774.81 for the audited period; and

WHEREAS, the Funds incurred attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $13,972.25 for the period of May 6, 2014 through September 30, 2015; and

WHEREAS, the Funds filed the instant suit on August 4, 2014 to recover the amounts due on behalf of Algozine's employees; and

WHEREAS, taking into consideration the uncertainties and costs of litigation and the time value of money, the parties desire to resolve, compromise, and settle the Funds' claims in the above-Captioned case.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the Funds and Algozine agree as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement, as though fully set forth herein.

2. The parties have agreed to enter into a payment plan covering the known amounts due and shall include 7% interest. Algozine shall submit minimum monthly installments according to the payment schedule as identified in Schedule A. In the event that Algozine submits a greater sum than what is identified in Schedule A, there shall be no prepayment penalty.

3. All payments arising from the attached Schedule A payment schedule shall be by check, made payable to the Local 52 Fringe Benefits Account and received on or before the due date in the offices of Baum Sigman Auerbach & Neuman, Ltd., 200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

4. In addition to the payments set forth in Schedule A, Algozine agrees to remain current with the regular submission of its monthly reports and contributions due thereon throughout the course of the payment schedule.

5. In the event that Algozinc fails to timely submit its monthly installment so that it is received by the first of the month or fails to timely submit its monthly reports and contributions which are due on the 20th day of the following month, Algozine shall have seven (7) days in which to cure its default. Accordingly, if Algozine's monthly installment is not received by the 8th of the month and/or its monthly reports and contributions are not received by the Fund Office on the 27th of each month, Algozine will be considered in breach of this Agreement. It shall further be considered a breach of this Agreement if Algozine exercises its right to cure a default for more than three (3) consecutive months.

6. Upon breach of this Agreement, any payments remaining due under Schedule A shall become immediately due. Algozine and ___________, individually agree to allow this Court to enter judgment against Algozine and ___________, individually upon a Motion by the Funds to enforce this Agreement with its only defense being that a payment of the balance due, plus the additional attorneys' fees and costs the Funds may incur to enforce this Agreement and/or collect the balance due and owing.

7. Nothing contained herein shall require the Funds to take legal action in the event of a breach of this Agreement. If the Funds decide in their sole discretion to permit additional time for Algozine to further cure such breach, such allowance of additional time shall not be construed as a waiver of their rights under this Agreement.

8. In the event that Algozine timely submits the installments due and remains current with the submission of its regular reports and contributions, Algozine may request that the Trustees reduce the liquidated damages covered under this Agreement. The Trustees agree to take into consideration Algozine's request, but make no representation that the request will be granted at this time.

9. Nothing herein limits the rights of the Funds to examine the payroll books and records of Algozine for any unaudited period in order to determine Algozine's compliance with its contribution obligations, nor do the terms of this Agreement limit or modify the Funds' right to recover from Algozine any additional amounts which may become due or which may be found to have been due as a result of such an audit.

10. The parties agree that, other than as stated herein, no promises or inducements have been made or offered; that this Agreement is not executed in reliance upon any statements or representations other than as stated herein; that this Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties hereto and shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties and their respective heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns; and that this Agreement may be only amended by a writing executed by all parties.

11. The parties agree and warrant that the individuals signing this Agreement have the capacity and authority, and have secured all necessary approval, to execute this Agreement and bird the parties to its terms.

12. This document may be executed in multiple or duplicate copies and each such executed copy shall be deemed to an original.

Plaintiffs: Defendant: Chicago Area Joint Welfare Committee for Algozine Masonry Restoration, Inc. the Painting, Cleaning and Caulking Industry, Local 52, el al., Signature: Signature: Printed Name: Joseph T. Algrizine Printed Terry Rocco Title: President Title: Administrative Manager Date: 11/12/15 Date: 12/1/2015 ________________, Individually Signature: _____________________ Printed Name:___________________ Title: _________________________ Date: 11-12-15

SCHEDULE A

Payment Due Beginning Payment Principal Interest Balance Number Date Balance Amount 7.00% Due 1 11/1/2015 520,795.80 $50,000.00 $46,962.02 $3,037.98 $473,833.78 2 12/1/2015 $473,833.78 $24,000.00 $20,742.39 $3,257.61 $453,091.38 3 1/1/2016 $453,091.38 $15,000.00 $11,885.00 $3,115.00 $441,206.39 4 2/1/2016 $441,206.39 $15,000.00 $11,966.71 $3,033.29 $429,239.68 5 3/1/2016 $429,239.68 $15,000.00 $12,048.98 $2,951.02 $417,190.70 6 4/1/2016 $417,190.70 $24,000.00 $21,131.81 $2,868.19 $396,058.89 7 5/1/2016 $396,058.89 $24,000.00 $21,277.10 $2,722.90 $374,781.79 8 6/1/2016 $374,781.79 $24,000.00 $21,423.38 $2,576.62 $353,358.42 9 7/1/2016 $353,358.42 $24,000.00 $21,570.66 $2,429.34 $331,787.76 10 8/1/2016 $331,787.76 $24,000.00 $21,718.96 $2,281.04 $310,068.80 11 9/1/2016 $310,068.80 $24,000.00 $21,868.28 $2,131.72 $288,200.52 12 10/1/2016 $288,200.52 $24,000 $22,018.62 $1,981.38 $266,181.90 13 11/1/2016 $266,181.90 $24,000 $22,170.00 $1,830.00 $244,011.90 14 12/1/2016 $244,011.90 $24,000 $22,322.42 $1,677.58 $221,689.48 15 1/1/2017 $221,689.48 $15,000 $13,475.88 $1,524.12 $208,213.60 16 2/1/2017 $208,213.60 $15,000 $13,568.53 $1,431.47 $194,645.07 17 3/1/2017 $194,645.07 $15,000 $13,661.82 $1,338.18 $180,983.25 18 4/1/2017 $180,983.25 $24,000 $22,755.74 $1,244.26 $158,227.51 19 5/1/2017 $158,227.51 $24,000 $22,912.19 $1,087.81 $135,315.32 20 6/1/2017 $135,315.32 $24,000 $23,069.71 $930.29 $112,245.62 21 7/1/2017 $112,245.62 $24,000 $23,228.31 $771.69 $89,017.31 22 8/1/2017 $89,017.31 $24,000 $23,388.01 $611.99 $65,629.30 23 9/1/2017 $65,629.30 $24,000 $23,548.80 $451.20 $42,080.50 24 10/1/2017 $42,080.50 $24,000 $23,710.70 $289.30 $18,369.81 25 11/1/2017 $18,369.81 $18,496 $18,369.81 $126.29 $0.00 $566,496.10 $520,795.80 $45,700.30
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer