Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MITTER v. COUNTY OF DuPAGE, 13 CV 841. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois Number: infdco20160909q66 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2016
Summary: MOTION FOR JUDGE'S DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ANDREA R. WOOD , District Judge . Now comes the Plaintiff, Hannah Mitter, by and through her attorneys, the Law Office of Trent & Butcher, and for her Motion For Judge's Decision on Motion For Summary Judgment, states as follows: 1. That on April 3, 2015, Defendants, Sheriff of DuPage County and Dr. Blaine Cusack, filed a Motion For Summary Judgment and a Memorandum In Support of Their Motion For Summary Judgment with regard to th
More

MOTION FOR JUDGE'S DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Now comes the Plaintiff, Hannah Mitter, by and through her attorneys, the Law Office of Trent & Butcher, and for her Motion For Judge's Decision on Motion For Summary Judgment, states as follows:

1. That on April 3, 2015, Defendants, Sheriff of DuPage County and Dr. Blaine Cusack, filed a Motion For Summary Judgment and a Memorandum In Support of Their Motion For Summary Judgment with regard to the above-captioned matter. 2. That on May 8, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment and a Local Rule 56.1 Response and Statement of Additional Facts Supporting Denial of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. 3. That on May 28, 2015, Defendants filed Responses to Plaintiff's 56.1 Statement of Additional Facts. 4. That, to date, this Court has not rendered a decision on Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment.

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Hannah Mitter, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court render a decision on Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment and for such other and further relief as is deemed just.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer