Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Ameriquest Mortgage Co. Mortgage Lending Practices Litigation, 1715 (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois Number: infdco20170302c14 Visitors: 1
Filed: Mar. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2017
Summary: ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN , District Judge . Presently before us is the February 7, 2017 Report and Recommendation ("Report") of Magistrate Judge Daniel G. Martin on Plaintiff Joyce Marie Griggs' renewed motion to set aside and/or motion to enforce settlement. (Indiv. Dkt. No. 52.) We dismissed Griggs' claims against all defendants with prejudice pursuant to a joint stipulation of dismissal on February 24, 2014. (Indiv. Dkt. No. 31.) Griggs filed her pro se motion to set aside the parties' sett
More

ORDER

Presently before us is the February 7, 2017 Report and Recommendation ("Report") of Magistrate Judge Daniel G. Martin on Plaintiff Joyce Marie Griggs' renewed motion to set aside and/or motion to enforce settlement. (Indiv. Dkt. No. 52.) We dismissed Griggs' claims against all defendants with prejudice pursuant to a joint stipulation of dismissal on February 24, 2014. (Indiv. Dkt. No. 31.) Griggs filed her pro se motion to set aside the parties' settlement agreement on September 17, 2015. (Dkt. No. 32.) That motion was stricken without prejudice, and she filed the instant renewed motion on November 3, 2016. (Dkt. Nos. 46.) After considering Griggs' renewed motion, along with the response of Defendants Ameriquest Mortgage Company and Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, the Report recommends that the motion be denied.

Magistrate Judge Martin ordered the parties to file written objections to the Report's proposed findings and recommendations within 14 days. (Report at 8.) No objections were filed by the deadline. After carefully considering the Report and the parties' submissions, we hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation. We agree Griggs' motion is untimely under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), she has failed to establish extraordinary grounds sufficient to warrant the relief she seeks, and her attempt to raise new claims against nonparties is improper. Accordingly, Griggs' renewed motion to set aside and/or motion to enforce settlement is denied.

It is so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer