Lymon v. Wexford Health Service, Inc., Case No: 17 CV 50093. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20181204972
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER FREDERICK J. KAPALA , District Judge . Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [106] from the magistrate judge that, in response to defendants' affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and after conducting a hearing under Pavey v. Conley , 544 F.3d 739 , 742 (7th Cir. 2008), this court dismiss plaintiff's claims against Dr. James without prejudice and all claims against the remaining defendants be allowed to proceed. Accordingly, there bein
Summary: ORDER FREDERICK J. KAPALA , District Judge . Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [106] from the magistrate judge that, in response to defendants' affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and after conducting a hearing under Pavey v. Conley , 544 F.3d 739 , 742 (7th Cir. 2008), this court dismiss plaintiff's claims against Dr. James without prejudice and all claims against the remaining defendants be allowed to proceed. Accordingly, there being..
More
ORDER
FREDERICK J. KAPALA, District Judge.
Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [106] from the magistrate judge that, in response to defendants' affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and after conducting a hearing under Pavey v. Conley, 544 F.3d 739, 742 (7th Cir. 2008), this court dismiss plaintiff's claims against Dr. James without prejudice and all claims against the remaining defendants be allowed to proceed. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the magistrate judge's R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R and dismisses without prejudice the claim against Dr. James.
Source: Leagle
