Murphy v. Berryhill, 17 CV 50198. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20181218b56
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER FREDERICK J. KAPALA , District Judge . Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [14] by the magistrate judge that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [5] be granted, the government's motion be denied, and the case be remanded. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 ,
Summary: ORDER FREDERICK J. KAPALA , District Judge . Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [14] by the magistrate judge that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [5] be granted, the government's motion be denied, and the case be remanded. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 , 1..
More
ORDER
FREDERICK J. KAPALA, District Judge.
Before the court is a report and recommendation ("R&R") [14] by the magistrate judge that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [5] be granted, the government's motion be denied, and the case be remanded. After being afforded a sufficient opportunity, neither party has offered any objection to the R&R. Accordingly, there being no written objection to the R&R, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985), and the court having reviewed the record and the R&R, the court accepts the R&R. This case is remanded.
Source: Leagle
