Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Martinez-Dominguez, 19 CR 561-3. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois Number: infdco20190911c33 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOHN ROBERT BLAKEY , District Judge . Upon the unopposed motion of the United States for a protective order pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d)(1), it is hereby ordered as follows: 1. All Title III applications, affidavits, and orders (collectively the "Title III Materials") produced by the government in connection with this case, and all other investigative materials and reports disclosed by the government in original or redacted form, may be utilized by defendant QUINTIN MARTINEZ-D
More

ORDER

Upon the unopposed motion of the United States for a protective order pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d)(1), it is hereby ordered as follows:

1. All Title III applications, affidavits, and orders (collectively the "Title III Materials") produced by the government in connection with this case, and all other investigative materials and reports disclosed by the government in original or redacted form, may be utilized by defendant QUINTIN MARTINEZ-DOMINGUEZ and his counsel solely in connection with the defense of this case and for no other purpose and in connection with no other proceeding. The materials and their contents, and any notes, records or copies of any kind that defense counsel or the defendant may make relating to the contents of materials provided by the government shall not be disclosed either directly or indirectly, verbally or in writing, to any person or entity other than the defendant, his counsel, such other persons as are reasonably employed by them as may be necessary to prepare a defense, or such other persons as to whom the Court may authorize disclosure. These restrictions do not apply to documents or materials that are public record, including, but not limited to, transcripts of proceedings; documents, recordings and other materials that have been received in evidence at public hearings or proceedings; or documents or materials that are otherwise in the public domain.

2. Intentional violation of this Order is punishable as a contempt, and may result in the imposition of civil and criminal sanctions. However, nothing contained in this protective order shall preclude any party from applying to the Court for further relief or for modification of any provision hereof.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer