Casciaro v. Allmen, 17 C 50094. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20200317a19
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2020
Summary: ORDER PHILIP G. REINHARD , District Judge . This matter comes before the court on the Order, Report and Recommendations ("R & R") [163] of Magistrate Judge Johnston recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss state law claims against defendant Rydberg and all claims against the unknown officers be granted. The court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). T
Summary: ORDER PHILIP G. REINHARD , District Judge . This matter comes before the court on the Order, Report and Recommendations ("R & R") [163] of Magistrate Judge Johnston recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss state law claims against defendant Rydberg and all claims against the unknown officers be granted. The court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Th..
More
ORDER
PHILIP G. REINHARD, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the Order, Report and Recommendations ("R & R") [163] of Magistrate Judge Johnston recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss state law claims against defendant Rydberg and all claims against the unknown officers be granted. The court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). In this case, the court has received no objections to the R & R (see [163], showing that objections were due by March 13, 2020). The court has reviewed the record in this case and finds that the February 28, 2020, R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the court adopts in its entirety Judge Johnston's R & R. State law claims against defendant Rydberg and all claims against the unknown officers are dismissed.
Source: Leagle
