U.S. v. RUSSELL, 10-30196-DRH. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20120503984
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 02, 2012
Latest Update: May 02, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief Judge. Now before the Court is a letter from the defendant requesting copies of documents in his case (Doc. 80). He asks for documents 2, 3, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 60 & 63. Defendant's motion states that he would like the documents "to better manage my case." The documents that defendant seeks are sealed documents that are only for the Court to view. They contain such information as grand juror names, juror names and other information that cannot be disclosed pursua
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief Judge. Now before the Court is a letter from the defendant requesting copies of documents in his case (Doc. 80). He asks for documents 2, 3, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 60 & 63. Defendant's motion states that he would like the documents "to better manage my case." The documents that defendant seeks are sealed documents that are only for the Court to view. They contain such information as grand juror names, juror names and other information that cannot be disclosed pursuan..
More
ORDER
DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief Judge.
Now before the Court is a letter from the defendant requesting copies of documents in his case (Doc. 80). He asks for documents 2, 3, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 60 & 63. Defendant's motion states that he would like the documents "to better manage my case." The documents that defendant seeks are sealed documents that are only for the Court to view. They contain such information as grand juror names, juror names and other information that cannot be disclosed pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002. Neither the government, the defendant nor the public are entitled to view these documents. Accordingly, the Court DENIES defendant's request for documents(Doc. 80). IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
