TAYLOR v. GAYLE, 11-cv-104-JPG-PMF. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20120521686
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 18, 2012
Latest Update: May 18, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 107) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny the motion for summary judgment filed by Dr. Feinerman (Doc. 88) in which he seeks dismissal on the affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate jud
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 107) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny the motion for summary judgment filed by Dr. Feinerman (Doc. 88) in which he seeks dismissal on the affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judg..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 107) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny the motion for summary judgment filed by Dr. Feinerman (Doc. 88) in which he seeks dismissal on the affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 107) and DENIES Dr. Feinerman's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 88).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
