U.S. v. WOMACK, 12-cr-30248-MJR-6. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20130912836
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2013
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CLIFFORD J. PROUD, Magistrate Judge. The United States of America and the Defendant having both filed a written consent, appeared before me pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and SDIL Rule 72.1(b)(2). The Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the o
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CLIFFORD J. PROUD, Magistrate Judge. The United States of America and the Defendant having both filed a written consent, appeared before me pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and SDIL Rule 72.1(b)(2). The Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the of..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
CLIFFORD J. PROUD, Magistrate Judge.
The United States of America and the Defendant having both filed a written consent, appeared before me pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and SDIL Rule 72.1(b)(2). The Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment.
After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by an independent factual basis containing each of the essential elements of such offense.
I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted, that a presentence investigation and report be prepared, and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.
Source: Leagle
