TUCKER v. MILLER & STEENO, P.C., 13-cv-861-DRH. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20140815m23
Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON, District Judge. Having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above action has been settled but that additional time is needed to consummate settlement, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice and without costs 60 days from the date of this Order. Should the parties fail to consummate settlement within 60 days, they may petition the Court to delay entry of judgment until a later date. In light of the settlement
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON, District Judge. Having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above action has been settled but that additional time is needed to consummate settlement, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice and without costs 60 days from the date of this Order. Should the parties fail to consummate settlement within 60 days, they may petition the Court to delay entry of judgment until a later date. In light of the settlement,..
More
ORDER
DAVID R. HERNDON, District Judge.
Having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above action has been settled but that additional time is needed to consummate settlement, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice and without costs 60 days from the date of this Order. Should the parties fail to consummate settlement within 60 days, they may petition the Court to delay entry of judgment until a later date. In light of the settlement, the Court DENIES all motions pending in this case as moot and VACATES all court dates in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
