Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. FREEMAN, 14-30021-MJR. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20140905c76 Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2014
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STEPHEN C. WILLIAMS, Magistrate Judge. The United States of America and the Defendant, having both filed a written consent, appeared before me pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 11 and SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS LOCAL RULE 72.1(b)(2). The Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Counts 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Superseding Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined tha
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

STEPHEN C. WILLIAMS, Magistrate Judge.

The United States of America and the Defendant, having both filed a written consent, appeared before me pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 11 and SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS LOCAL RULE 72.1(b)(2). The Defendant entered a plea of guilty to Counts 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Superseding Indictment.

After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the offenses charged are supported by an independent factual basis containing each of the essential elements of such offense.

I therefore RECOMMEND that the Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted; that a presentence investigation report be prepared, and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer