WILLIAMS v. FENOGLIO, 14-cv-506-JPG-PMF. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20140911909
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 44) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Leonard Williams' motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 43). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 44) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Leonard Williams' motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 43). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo t..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 44) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Leonard Williams' motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 43).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court:
• ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 44); and
• DENIES without prejudice Williams' motions for a preliminary injunction(Doc. 43).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
