O'QUINN v. GAETZ, 13-cv-1342-JPG-PMF. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20141209835
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 117) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Chester O'Quinn's motion for an emergency injunction or temporary restraining order (Doc. 97), motion for future and current temporary restraining order (Doc. 100), motion for immediate emergency temporary restraining order and injunctive relief (Doc. 103) and motion for
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 117) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Chester O'Quinn's motion for an emergency injunction or temporary restraining order (Doc. 97), motion for future and current temporary restraining order (Doc. 100), motion for immediate emergency temporary restraining order and injunctive relief (Doc. 103) and motion for c..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 117) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending that the Court deny plaintiff Chester O'Quinn's motion for an emergency injunction or temporary restraining order (Doc. 97), motion for future and current temporary restraining order (Doc. 100), motion for immediate emergency temporary restraining order and injunctive relief (Doc. 103) and motion for current and future injunctive orders (Doc. 108).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. It has reviewed the Report and finds it is not clearly erroneous and, accordingly:
• ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 117);
• DENIES O'Quinn's motion for an emergency injunction or temporary restraining order (Doc. 97);
• DENIES O'Quinn's motion for future and current temporary restraining order (Doc. 100);
• DENIES O'Quinn's motion for immediate emergency temporary restraining order and injunctive relief (Doc. 103); and
• DENIES O'Quinn's motion for current and future injunctive orders (Doc. 108).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
