J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. LEWIS, 14-cv-652-SMY-DGW. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20150305984
Visitors: 24
Filed: Mar. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER STACI M. YANDLE , District Judge . On June 6, 2014, Plaintiff filed its Complaint against Defendants. On November 10, 2014, the Court entered a Notice of Impending Dismissal (Doc. 13) for want of prosecution stating that if Plaintiff did not serve Defendants within twenty days, its case would be dismissed. On November 26, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 14) to serve Defendants. The Court granted Plaintiff's Motion, and extended Plaintiff's time to serve Defe
Summary: ORDER STACI M. YANDLE , District Judge . On June 6, 2014, Plaintiff filed its Complaint against Defendants. On November 10, 2014, the Court entered a Notice of Impending Dismissal (Doc. 13) for want of prosecution stating that if Plaintiff did not serve Defendants within twenty days, its case would be dismissed. On November 26, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 14) to serve Defendants. The Court granted Plaintiff's Motion, and extended Plaintiff's time to serve Defen..
More
ORDER
STACI M. YANDLE, District Judge.
On June 6, 2014, Plaintiff filed its Complaint against Defendants. On November 10, 2014, the Court entered a Notice of Impending Dismissal (Doc. 13) for want of prosecution stating that if Plaintiff did not serve Defendants within twenty days, its case would be dismissed. On November 26, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 14) to serve Defendants. The Court granted Plaintiff's Motion, and extended Plaintiff's time to serve Defendants until January 28, 2015 (Doc. 15). On February 2, 2015, after Plaintiff had failed to serve Defendants, the Court entered another Notice of Impending Dismissal (Doc. 17) for want of prosecution stating that if Plaintiff did not serve Defendants within twenty days, its case would be dismissed. To date, Plaintiff has not filed anything with this Court showing that Defendants have been served. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
