Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MEJIA-CHAVEZ, 12-CR-30242-DRH-3. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20150309a79 Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2015
Summary: PRELIMINARY ORDER FOR FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO FED.R.CRIM.P 32.2 WITH RESPECT TO JOSE IVAN MEJIA-CHAVEZ DAVID R. HERNDON , District Judge . In the Indictment filed in the above cause on August 22, 2012, the United States sought forfeiture of property of Defendant, Jose Ivan Mejia-Chavez, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 853. The Court, upon consideration of the guilty plea received in this matter and the provisions of the plea agreement, hereby finds by a preponderance of evidence that the following
More

PRELIMINARY ORDER FOR FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO FED.R.CRIM.P 32.2 WITH RESPECT TO JOSE IVAN MEJIA-CHAVEZ

In the Indictment filed in the above cause on August 22, 2012, the United States sought forfeiture of property of Defendant, Jose Ivan Mejia-Chavez, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853. The Court, upon consideration of the guilty plea received in this matter and the provisions of the plea agreement, hereby finds by a preponderance of evidence that the following property is forfeitable and hereby orders forfeited the following property:

United States funds of $35,738 seized on June 20, 2012.

The United States shall provide notice of the forfeiture and the right of persons other than the defendant who have any claim or legal interest in any of the property to file a petition with the Court. The notice shall be provided in a manner consistent with Supplemental Rule G(4)(a) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.

The notice shall state that the petition shall be set for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of the petitioner's alleged interest in the property, shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury, and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner's right, title, or interest in the forfeited property, the time and circumstances of the petitioner's acquisition of the right, title or interest in the property, any additional facts supporting the petitioner's claim, and the relief sought.

The United States shall, also to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person known to have alleged an interest in the property that is the subject of the Order for Forfeiture, as a substitute for the published notice to those persons so notified.

Upon the filing a petition alleging the third-party interests in the property, the court may amend this order to resolve the claimed third-party interests.

The United States Marshal shall seize and reduce to his possession, if he has not already done so, the above-described property.

This Order, pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, shall become final with respect to Defendant Jose Ivan Mejia-Chavez at the time of the Defendant's sentencing, regardless of whether or not the rights of actual or potential third-party petitioners have been determined by that time. This Order shall be made part of the sentence of Defendant Jose Ivan Mejia-Chavez and shall be included in the Judgment imposed against the Defendant. This Order is a final order with respect to the Defendant, and this Order may be amended with respect to petitions filed by third-parties claiming an interest in the subject-matter forfeited property.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer