DAVID R. HERNDON, District Judge.
Now before the Court is defendant Lowe's motion to set aside or defer payment of fine (Doc. 82). Lowe states that his family can no longer make payments on the fine and that he is not making sufficient money to pay the fine while incarcerated. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is DENIED.
Lowe was sentenced to 292 months in prison, 10 years of supervised release, in addition to a $400 special assessment and a $1000 fine. With regard to payments, the Court ordered as follows:
First, the Court notes that the defendant's family is not responsible for or obligated to pay the defendant's criminal monetary penalties. Second, as the defendant is currently incarcerated, the payment of the fine and special assessment is voluntary. See United States v. Boyd, 608 F.3d 331, 334 (7th Cir. 2010) ("The IFRP can be an important part of a prisoner's efforts toward rehabilitation, but strictly speaking, participation in the program is voluntary.").
To the extent that defendant does not want to participate in the IFRP program at all and thus, prefers to forgo any applicable privileges (for example participation in the UNICOR program), his motion is denied as MOOT (as participation is voluntary).
To the extent that defendant objects to the amount assessed under the IFRP program and/or objects to other aspects of the program, he must exhaust his administrative remedies before filing a claim with this Court. Moreover, any such petition would need to be filed as a Section 2241 petition. See Ihmoud v. Jett, 272 Fed. Appx. 525, *1 (7th Cir. 2008) (citing Matheny v. Morrison, 307 F.3d 709, 712 (8th Cir. 2002) (stating that challenges to IFRP collection mechanism concern execution of sentence and are therefore correctly framed as § 2241 claims). Accordingly, any such request is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction.
For the reasons discussed above, Lowe's motion to set aside or defer payment of fine (Doc. 82) is DENIED.