GILLUM v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, INC., 14-cv-810-SMY-PMF. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20150603a48
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 02, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STACI M. YANDLE , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 47) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies (Doc. 29). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must revi
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STACI M. YANDLE , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 47) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies (Doc. 29). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must revie..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STACI M. YANDLE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 47) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies (Doc. 29).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the R & R. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 47) and GRANTS Defendants' Motion (Doc. 29). Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21) is DENIED as moot. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 40) is DENIED as moot. Defendants' Motion to Substitute Affidavit (Doc. 43) is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (Doc. 48) is DENIED as moot. As no further claims remain pending, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle