IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20150624b33
Visitors: 26
Filed: Jun. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON , District Judge . ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO WITHDRAW This matter is before the Court on movant, attorney Nabil Nachawati's, motions to withdraw as counsel of record (on behalf of herself and in the case of plaintiff Victoria Moore in No. 14-10231 on behalf of herself and Garnett Ellsworth Hendrix) for the above captioned plaintiffs. After considering the motions, the Court finds that the requirements of Local Rule 83.1 and of the applicable provisions of the Rules of
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON , District Judge . ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO WITHDRAW This matter is before the Court on movant, attorney Nabil Nachawati's, motions to withdraw as counsel of record (on behalf of herself and in the case of plaintiff Victoria Moore in No. 14-10231 on behalf of herself and Garnett Ellsworth Hendrix) for the above captioned plaintiffs. After considering the motions, the Court finds that the requirements of Local Rule 83.1 and of the applicable provisions of the Rules of ..
More
ORDER
DAVID R. HERNDON, District Judge.
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO WITHDRAW
This matter is before the Court on movant, attorney Nabil Nachawati's, motions to withdraw as counsel of record (on behalf of herself and in the case of plaintiff Victoria Moore in No. 14-10231 on behalf of herself and Garnett Ellsworth Hendrix) for the above captioned plaintiffs. After considering the motions, the Court finds that the requirements of Local Rule 83.1 and of the applicable provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct pertaining to withdrawal of counsel have been satisfied. The motion is therefore GRANTED.
FURTHER, the Court DIRECTS MOVANT to serve a copy of this order of withdrawal within 7 days upon all counsel of record and upon unrepresented parties as required by Local Rule 83.1.
FURTHER, the Court ORDERS as follows:
1. Supplementary Entry of Appearance: Should plaintiff choose to continue pursuing this action, plaintiff or her new counsel must file a supplementary entry of appearance within 21 days of the entry of this Order.
2. If plaintiff or her new counsel fails to file a supplementary entry of appearance within 21 days of the entry of this Order, plaintiff's action will be subject to dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or to comply with the orders of this Court.
3. Further, if after 21 days of the entry of this order, the plaintiff is not in compliance with the requirements any court rule or order (including applicable MDL case management orders), the plaintiff's action may be subject to dismissal, including dismissal WITH prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. This Order applies only to plaintiffs Tangela Bailey and Sonia Jimenez.
2. This Order applies only to plaintiff Taylor Roberts.
3. This Order applies to all plaintiffs.
4. This Order applies only to plaintiffs Jacinda C. Jordan and Tiana Miller.
5. This Order applies only to plaintiff Sarah Annette Reves Smith.
6. This Order applies only to plaintiff Victoria Moore.
Source: Leagle
