IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20150723857
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jul. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE DAVID R. HERNDON , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.) motions for an order dismissing the above captioned plaintiffs' claims without prejudice for failure to file an appearance as required by this Court's Order and Local Rule 83.1(g)(2). In each of the above captioned cases, the Court granted a motion to withdraw filed by counsel. The orders granting leave to withdraw expressly p
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE DAVID R. HERNDON , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.) motions for an order dismissing the above captioned plaintiffs' claims without prejudice for failure to file an appearance as required by this Court's Order and Local Rule 83.1(g)(2). In each of the above captioned cases, the Court granted a motion to withdraw filed by counsel. The orders granting leave to withdraw expressly pr..
More
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
DAVID R. HERNDON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's (Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.) motions for an order dismissing the above captioned plaintiffs' claims without prejudice for failure to file an appearance as required by this Court's Order and Local Rule 83.1(g)(2).
In each of the above captioned cases, the Court granted a motion to withdraw filed by counsel. The orders granting leave to withdraw expressly provided that if the subject plaintiff (or her new counsel) failed to file a timely supplementary entry of appearance, the action would be subject to dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or to comply with the orders of this Court. To date, and in violation of this Court's orders and Local Rule 83.1(g), the above captioned plaintiffs have not filed a supplementary appearance. In addition, the above captioned plaintiffs have not responded to the pending motions to dismiss.
The plaintiffs must comply with the Local Rules and this Court's orders. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein, the claims of the above captioned plaintiffs are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to revise the dockets accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. This Order of dismissal applies only to plaintiff Brandi Manning's claims. However, as all other plaintiffs have previously been dismissed, this matter will be dismissed in its entirety.
2. This Order of dismissal applies only to plaintiff Genise Key's claims.
3. This Order of dismissal applies only to plaintiff Schkaylle Marshall's claims.
4. This Order of dismissal applies only to plaintiff Megan Evans' claims.
5. This Order of dismissal applies only to plaintiff Christine DeGrazia's claims.
6. This Order of dismissal applies only to plaintiff Sylvia Goines' claims.
7. This Order of dismissal applies only to plaintiff Stephanie Scroggins' claims.
Source: Leagle
