Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MERRITTE v. KESSELL, 12-cv-00263-JPG-PMF. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20151007b44 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Pro Se Objection (Doc. 213) to Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc. 212) denying Plaintiff's Motion to Issue Subpoena (Doc. 211) as the Plaintiff sought production of documents outside the 100 mile limit set forth at Rule 45(c)(2)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As stated in Magistrate Judge Frazier's Order: "Although attorneys may issue subpoenas on their own, pro se litigant
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Pro Se Objection (Doc. 213) to Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc. 212) denying Plaintiff's Motion to Issue Subpoena (Doc. 211) as the Plaintiff sought production of documents outside the 100 mile limit set forth at Rule 45(c)(2)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

As stated in Magistrate Judge Frazier's Order: "Although attorneys may issue subpoenas on their own, pro se litigants must have their subpoenas issued through the Court Clerk. Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(a)(3)." At the time Plaintiff filed his Motion to Issue Subpoenas and his Objection to the denial of his motion, he was pro se. Subsequently, Plaintiff has been appointed counsel and his attorney may issue subpoenas he believes necessary without approval of the Court.

As such, Plaintiff's Pro Se Objection (Doc. 213) to Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc. 212) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer