PHELPS v. GODINEZ, 15-cv-00073-SMY-PMF. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20151204971
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STACI M. YANDLE , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 47) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court deny Plaintiff's second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 43). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the porti
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STACI M. YANDLE , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 47) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court deny Plaintiff's second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 43). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portio..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STACI M. YANDLE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 47) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court deny Plaintiff's second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 43).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Motions and case history and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report of Magistrate Judge Frazier (Doc. 47) and DENIES Plaintiff's Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 43).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
