U.S. v. McCLAIN, 02-cr-40076-JPG. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20160122805
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on defendant Thurman E. McClain's motion for a reduction of the sentence imposed on the revocation of his term of supervised release (Doc. 71). McClain pled guilty and was sentenced in May 2003 for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He served his sentence and began his term of supervised release. After McClain violated several conditions of his supervised release, the Court revoked his supervi
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on defendant Thurman E. McClain's motion for a reduction of the sentence imposed on the revocation of his term of supervised release (Doc. 71). McClain pled guilty and was sentenced in May 2003 for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He served his sentence and began his term of supervised release. After McClain violated several conditions of his supervised release, the Court revoked his supervis..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant Thurman E. McClain's motion for a reduction of the sentence imposed on the revocation of his term of supervised release (Doc. 71). McClain pled guilty and was sentenced in May 2003 for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He served his sentence and began his term of supervised release. After McClain violated several conditions of his supervised release, the Court revoked his supervised release in June 2012 and sentenced him to additional terms of incarceration and supervised release. During this additional term of supervised release, McClain again violated the conditions of his release, and in November 2013, and the Court again revoked his supervised release and imposed terms of incarceration and supervised release. McClain now complains that his latest term of imprisonment exceeds the legally permissible limit.
The Court DISMISSES McClain's motion (Doc. 71). The Court imposed McClain's final sentence on his second revocation more than two years ago, and McClain has cited no authority giving the Court jurisdiction to reconsider that decision at this point.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
