Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BOLLING v. U.S., 16-cv-00055-JPG. (2016)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20160128d61 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. It is noted that Petitioner filed a previous motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255, but withdrew the motion shortly after filing. See Bolling v. USA, 12-cv-1165-JPG. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals must certify a successive petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255(h). Curry v. United States, 507 F.3d
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. It is noted that Petitioner filed a previous motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, but withdrew the motion shortly after filing. See Bolling v. USA, 12-cv-1165-JPG. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals must certify a successive petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Curry v. United States, 507 F.3d 603, 604 (7th Cir. 2007); Nunez v. United States, 96 F.3d 990, 991 (7th Cir. 1996). However, since the Petitioner withdrew the motion and it was never considered by this Court, the Court has determined that the current motion is not a successive motion and can proceed without certification.

Administrative Order 176 provides that the Federal Public Defender's Office for the Southern District of Illinois (FPD) shall be appointed to handle motions to vacate or correct sentence based on Johnson v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015) (holding that an increased sentence under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) violates the right to due process). The case at bar is a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on Johnson as applied to the career offender guideline U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2), which uses the same clause that was found unconstitutionally vague in the ACCA.

Therefore, pursuant to Administrative Order 176, the FPD is APPOINTED to represent the Petitioner in this matter. The Court assumes that the Petitioner financially qualifies for appointment of counsel based on the financial affidavit in his criminal proceedings and his subsequent and continuing incarceration. Upon entry of appearance, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to give the FPD sealed access to documents relating to the defendant. The FPD is DIRECTED to file an amended 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition no later than 60 days after his entry of appearance. The Government's response to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition is STAYED until such time as the Court directs the Government to respond to the amended petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer