DAMEONCOLE v. COE, 3:14-cv-01314-JPG-PMF. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20160201c24
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2016
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PHILIP M. FRAZIER , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is plaintiff Dameon Cole's motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 27). The motion is opposed by defendant Dr. Coe, to whom the motion is directed (Doc. No. 28). The motion is not supported by citation to authority, and the Court cannot locate a Clerk's entry of default or any information demonstrating that the request has substantial merit. Dr. Coe waived formal service, filed a timely Answer, sought a protec
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PHILIP M. FRAZIER , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is plaintiff Dameon Cole's motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 27). The motion is opposed by defendant Dr. Coe, to whom the motion is directed (Doc. No. 28). The motion is not supported by citation to authority, and the Court cannot locate a Clerk's entry of default or any information demonstrating that the request has substantial merit. Dr. Coe waived formal service, filed a timely Answer, sought a protect..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PHILIP M. FRAZIER, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff Dameon Cole's motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 27). The motion is opposed by defendant Dr. Coe, to whom the motion is directed (Doc. No. 28).
The motion is not supported by citation to authority, and the Court cannot locate a Clerk's entry of default or any information demonstrating that the request has substantial merit. Dr. Coe waived formal service, filed a timely Answer, sought a protective order, and is participating in discovery.
IT IS RECOMMENDED that the motion (Doc. No. 27) be DENIED.
Source: Leagle
