SANTIAGO v. KRAUSE, 12-cv-988-JPG-PMF. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20160329987
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier (Doc. 153) recommending that the Court deny the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Brad Coleman, Douglas Krause and Sean Wolters (Doc. 129). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier (Doc. 153) recommending that the Court deny the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Brad Coleman, Douglas Krause and Sean Wolters (Doc. 129). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier (Doc. 153) recommending that the Court deny the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Brad Coleman, Douglas Krause and Sean Wolters (Doc. 129).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:
• ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 153); and
• DENIES the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 129).
The Court further ORDERS the parties to submit a proposed final pretrial order to Magistrate Judge Frazier's chambers on or before April 29, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
