Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. ARNOLD, 3:12-cr-30180-DRH-1. (2017)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20170531d48 Visitors: 28
Filed: May 30, 2017
Latest Update: May 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court for case management. In accordance with this District's Administrative Order No. 167, the Court referred the above-styled case to the Federal Public Defender ("FPD") (Doc. 35). In April 2016, the FPD's Office entered its appearance for defendant (Doc. 36). Now the Assistant FPD—having determined there is no meritorious basis for obtaining relief defendant seeks—has moved to withdraw his appearance (Doc. 37). Purs
More

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court for case management. In accordance with this District's Administrative Order No. 167, the Court referred the above-styled case to the Federal Public Defender ("FPD") (Doc. 35). In April 2016, the FPD's Office entered its appearance for defendant (Doc. 36). Now the Assistant FPD—having determined there is no meritorious basis for obtaining relief defendant seeks—has moved to withdraw his appearance (Doc. 37).

Pursuant to district-wide procedure, defendant is ALLOWED thirty (30) days or until July 1, 2017 to file a response to counsel's motion to withdraw. Defendant's failure to act will be interpreted as implied consent; as failure to respond within the 30-day time period will result in the grant of the motion to withdraw.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to provide defendant with a copy of the motion to withdraw as counsel (Doc. 37), and of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer