Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dunigan v. St. Clair County Jail, 3:15-cv-01371-JPG-DGW. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20180108760 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 37) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson with regard to the defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (Doc. 24). The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") (Doc. 37) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson with regard to the defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (Doc. 24). The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

Here, the Court has received no objection to the Report. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the Report is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby:

ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 37); GRANTS the defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (Doc. 24); DISMISSES this case with prejudice; and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer