Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sanford v. Madison County, 16-cv-738-JPG-RJD. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20180402b65 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Esmond L. Sanford's claim against Madison County Jail is dismissed with prejudice; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Esmond L. Sanford's claims under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. 2000cc-1 et seq., and for injunctive relief und
More

JUDGMENT

This matter having come before the Court, the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Esmond L. Sanford's claim against Madison County Jail is dismissed with prejudice;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Esmond L. Sanford's claims under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1 et seq., and for injunctive relief under the First Amendment are dismissed without prejudice; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants Capt. Gary Bost, Capt. Donald Bunt, Sheriff Robert Hertz (in his individual and official capacities) and Madison County, Illinois, and against plaintiff Esmond L. Sanford on Sanford's First Amendment free exercise claims for damages asserting he was not afforded adequate opportunities to practice his religion while detained at the Madison County Jail.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer