Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Coomer v. Commissioner of Social Security, 17-cv-914-CJP. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20190225883 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES CLIFFORD J. PROUD , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's Application for Attorney's Fees. (Doc. 33). Defendant has responded that she has no objection. (Doc. 34). The parties agree that plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $5,158.00, with no additional amount for costs or expenses. The Court finds that plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to an award of attorney's fees pursuant to the
More

ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's Application for Attorney's Fees. (Doc. 33). Defendant has responded that she has no objection. (Doc. 34).

The parties agree that plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $5,158.00, with no additional amount for costs or expenses.

The Court finds that plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to an award of attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)(1)(B). The Court further finds that the agreed upon amount is reasonable and appropriate. This award shall fully and completely satisfy any and all claims for fees, expenses, and costs, that may have been payable to plaintiff in this matter pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412.

Plaintiff's Application for Attorney's Fees (Doc. 33) is GRANTED. The Court awards plaintiff attorney's fees in the amount of $5,158 (five thousand one hundred fifty-eight dollars and zero cents), with no additional amount for costs or expenses.

The amount awarded is payable to plaintiff and is subject to set-off for any debt owed by plaintiff to the United States, per Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). See also, Harrington v. Berryhill, 906 F.3d 561 (7th Cir. 2018). However, any part of the award that is not subject to set-off to pay plaintiff's pre-existing debt to the United States shall be made payable to plaintiff's attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment executed by plaintiff and attached to the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer