Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Berta v. Blankenship, 3:17-cv-00077-JPG-MAB. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20190621a83 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty has issued a Report and Recommendations ("Report") on the defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 52, 69.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in his Report. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial obj
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty has issued a Report and Recommendations ("Report") on the defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 52, 69.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in his Report. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

No party here has made an objection, and Magistrate Judge Beatty's Report withstands a review for clear error. For that reason, the Court:

ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 69); GRANTS the defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 52); DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE; and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer