Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Davis v. Cranmer, 3:18-cv-00519-JPG-MAB. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20190716b33 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jul. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty regarding the defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 30.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections ar
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty regarding the defendants' motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 30.) The Court may accept, reject, or modify—in whole or in part—the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

Here, no party has filed an objection. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds no clear error in the Report. The Court accordingly:

ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (ECF No. 30); GRANTS the defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 22); and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in favor of the defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer