Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Novy, 19-cr-30100-SMY-01. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20191024a29 Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER DONALD G. WILKERSON , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Donald K. Novy was released on bond on July 15, 2019. The conditions of defendant's bond required, among other things, that he not commit another criminal offense, that he refrain from any use or unlawful possession of narcotic drugs and other controlled substances unless prescribed by a licensed medical practitioner, he participate in a substance abuse counseling program and that he submit to drug testing, and that report any contac
More

ORDER

Defendant Donald K. Novy was released on bond on July 15, 2019. The conditions of defendant's bond required, among other things, that he not commit another criminal offense, that he refrain from any use or unlawful possession of narcotic drugs and other controlled substances unless prescribed by a licensed medical practitioner, he participate in a substance abuse counseling program and that he submit to drug testing, and that report any contact with law enforcement. See, Doc. 11.

This matter is now before the court on the Government's Ex Parte Motion to Revoke Bond, Doc. 16. The Court held a hearing on the Motion on October 23, 2019. Defendant appeared in person represented by counsel.

18 U.S.C. § 3148 mandates that an order of revocation and detention be entered if the Court:

(1) finds that there is — (A) probable cause to believe that the person has committed a Federal, State, or local crime while on release; or (B) clear and convincing evidence that the person has violated any other condition of release; and (2) finds that — (A) based on the factors set forth in section 3142(g) of this title, there is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure that the person will not flee or pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community; or (B) the person is unlikely to abide by any condition or combination of conditions of release.

If there is probable cause to believe that, while on release, the person committed a Federal, State, or local felony, a rebuttable presumption arises that no condition or combination of conditions will assure that the person will not pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community. 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b).

The government alleges that defendant violated the conditions of his release in the following respects:

1. Defendant unlawfully possessed and used methamphetamine and amphetamine at least three times while on bond. 2. Defendant failed failing to attend substance abuse counseling sessions on September 12 and 26, 2019, and checked himself out of residential treatment prior to successfully completing the program. 3. Defendant failed to report contact with law enforcement on September 21, 2019. 4. Defendant failed to submit a urine specimen for drug testing when requested on October 2, 2019.

Defendant did not contest the motion. Based upon the information presented, the Court finds probable cause to believe that defendant committed a criminal offense in that he illegally possessed and used controlled substances. The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that defendant violated other conditions of release as set forth above. Defendant has not rebutted the presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will assure that he will not pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community. This Court finds that it is highly unlikely that he would abide by any condition or combination of conditions of release which could be devised.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Government's Motion to Revoke Bond (Doc. 16) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant, Donald K. Novy, be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal; that the defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with his counsel; and, that, on order of a court of the United States, or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer