STACI M. YANDLE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the defendant's motions for a reduction of his criminal sentence following the retroactive application of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub. L. 111-220; §§ 2-3, 124 Stat. 2372, 2372 (2010), as set forth in the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (2018) (Docs. 481 and 485). The Court construes these as motions pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B). Assistant Federal Public Defender Daniel G. Cronin entered his appearance on behalf of the defendant (Doc. 486) and subsequently filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel on the basis the First Step Act does not apply (Doc. 487). For the following reasons, the Motions to Reduce Sentence under the First Step Act are
Section 404 of the First Step Act allows the Court to reduce a defendant's sentence for a crack cocaine offense, but only if the Court had imposed that sentence before the Fair Sentencing Act the statutory sentencing range for that crack cocaine offense. First Step Act, § 404(b). In essence, the First Step Act retroactively applies the Fair Sentencing Act's lower statutory sentencing ranges and allows the Court to bring past sentences into line with the lower ranges. The authority to reduce a sentence pursuant to the First Step Act applies only to (1) federal offenses (2) committed before August 3, 2010, the effective date of the Fair Sentencing Act, (3) for which the Fair Sentencing Act changed the statutory penalty range, i.e., certain crack cocaine offenses. See First Step Act, § 404(a). Whether to reduce a sentence under the First Step Act is within the discretion of the Court. First Step Act, § 404(c). In other words, the Court may, but is not required to, reduce a defendant's sentence if the Fair Sentencing Act changed the applicable statutory penalty range.
Defendant was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine and aiding and abetting the possession with intent to distribute cocaine and sentenced to 180 months' imprisonment on April 26, 2013 (Doc. 389). Because Defendant was not convicted of a crack cocaine offense, the First Step Act does not authorize a reduction in his sentence.
Accordingly, the Court