Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hanks v. Commissioner of Social Security, 19-cv-208-DGW. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20191209970 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER for ATTORNEY'S FEES DONALD G. WILKERSON , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the parties' Joint Motion to Award Attorney Fees. (Doc. 30). The parties agree that plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $7,559.76. The Court finds that plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to an award of attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(B). The Court further finds that the agreed upon amount is reasonable
More

ORDER for ATTORNEY'S FEES

Before the Court is the parties' Joint Motion to Award Attorney Fees. (Doc. 30).

The parties agree that plaintiff is entitled to an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $7,559.76.

The Court finds that plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to an award of attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §2412(d)(1)(B). The Court further finds that the agreed upon amount is reasonable and appropriate. Per the parties' agreement, this award shall fully and completely satisfy any and all claims for fees and expenses that may have been payable to plaintiff in this matter pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The motion does not address costs.

The parties' Joint Motion to Award Attorney Fees (Doc. 30) is GRANTED. The Court awards plaintiff the sum of $7,559.76 (seven thousand five hundred and fifty-nine dollars and seventy-six cents) for attorney fees. These funds shall be payable to plaintiff, per Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). See also, Harrington v. Berryhill, 906 F.3d 561 (7th Cir. 2018). However, in accordance with the parties' agreement, any part of the award that is not subject to set-off to pay plaintiff's pre-existing debt to the United States shall be made payable to plaintiff's attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment previously executed by plaintiff and counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer