Douds v. United States, 18-cv-01144-JPG. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20200305b99
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court and the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff on the following claims: COUNT I, a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act for inadequate treatment of plaintiff's serious medical needs involving back and foot issues is DISMISSED without prejudice against defendant United
Summary: JUDGMENT J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter having come before the Court and the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff on the following claims: COUNT I, a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act for inadequate treatment of plaintiff's serious medical needs involving back and foot issues is DISMISSED without prejudice against defendant United S..
More
JUDGMENT
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter having come before the Court and the issues having been heard, and the Court having rendered a decision,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff on the following claims:
COUNT I, a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act for inadequate treatment of plaintiff's serious medical needs involving back and foot issues is DISMISSED without prejudice against defendant United States;
COUNT II, a Bivens claim for deliberate indifference to plaintiff's medical conditions involving back and foot issues at Butner Medical Center was severed into a new suit at screening and is DISMISSED with prejudice from this action against defendant Unknown Doctor;
COUNT III, a Bivens claim for deliberate indifference to plaintiff's medical conditions at FCI Greenville is DISMISSED with prejudice against defendants Gillian, Adesanya, Braggs, and Kruse and without prejudice against defendant Robinson;
COUNT IV, a Bivens claim for deliberate indifference to plaintiff's medical conditions involving back and foot issues at MCFP Springfield was severed into a new suit at screening and is DISMISSED with prejudice from this action against defendant Gapasin; and
ALL CLAIMS against defendant BOP Medical Personnel are DISMISSED with prejudice.
This dismissal shall not count as one of Plaintiff's three allotted "strikes" under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
