CRONE, Judge.
Giorgio E. White appeals his conviction for class C felony carrying a handgun without a license, claiming that the State failed to present sufficient evidence that he constructively possessed the handgun that was found in the back seat of the SUV in which he was a passenger. We affirm.
The facts most favorable to the jury's verdict are that at approximately 11:30 p.m. on June 26, 2011, Fort Wayne Police Department Officer Christopher Felton stopped an SUV driven by Tyisha Bell because she had not dimmed her high-beam headlights for oncoming traffic. White was in the SUV's front passenger seat. As Officer Felton approached the SUV, he saw White twist his body, lean back, and place his right hand on the air bag compartment and his left hand "behind the seat, behind the center console." Tr. at 77.
Officer Gary Hensler opened the front passenger door and asked White to exit the SUV. As Officer Hensler walked toward the rear of the SUV, he saw a loaded firearm magazine in the back seat. He alerted the other officers to the possible presence of a firearm, handcuffed White, and led him back to his squad car. Officer Hensler Mirandized White, who said that "he could not be caught on the streets, people are looking to kill him." Id. at 99. In addition to the loaded magazine, the officers found a loaded handgun "in the backseat on the floorboard, pretty much right behind [the] center console in the middle within reach of both the passenger and the driver." Id. at 79. The handgun was positioned so that "the slide was down, the magazine was up, [and] the barrel was facing right towards the driver[`]s side." Id.
The State charged White with class C felony carrying a handgun without a license, and a jury found him guilty as charged. White now appeals.
White challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction. In reviewing such challenges, we neither reweigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of the witnesses. Broude v. State, 956 N.E.2d 130, 135 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011), trans. denied (2012). Instead, we consider only the evidence favorable to the verdict and all reasonable inferences therefrom. Id. "We will affirm the conviction unless no rational fact-finder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." Id. (citation and quotation marks omitted).
To convict White of class C felony carrying a handgun without a license, the State had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he carried a handgun in a vehicle or on or about his person without a license and that he had a prior qualifying felony conviction. Ind. Code §§ 35-47-2-1, -23. A conviction for handgun possession may rest on proof of either actual or constructive possession. Bradshaw v. State, 818 N.E.2d 59, 62 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). Actual possession occurs when a person has direct physical control over an item. Id. "[T]o prove constructive possession, the State must show that a defendant had both the intent and capability to maintain dominion and control over the contraband." Id. at 62-63 (citation omitted).
Id. at 63 (citation omitted). Those additional circumstances may include "(1) incriminating statements made by a defendant; (2) attempted flight or furtive gestures; (3) proximity of contraband to the defendant; (4) location of the contraband within the defendant's plain view; or (5) the mingling of the contraband with other items owned by the defendant." Id.
Here, White contends that the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he constructively possessed the handgun found in the back seat of Bell's SUV, over which he did not have exclusive dominion or control. White points to Bell's testimony that three other persons had been in the SUV before she picked him up and that he had been in the SUV for only six or seven minutes before it was stopped by Officer Felton. White's argument is merely an invitation to reweigh evidence and judge witness credibility, which we may not do. After Officer Felton stopped Bell's SUV, he saw White twist his body and place his left hand near the area where the loaded magazine and handgun were found. After those items were discovered, White remarked that "he could not be caught on the streets, people are looking to kill him." Tr. at 99. This evidence was more than sufficient for a rational jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that White constructively possessed the handgun. Therefore, we affirm his conviction.
Affirmed.
RILEY, J., and BAILEY, J., concur.