Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. DEL CAMPO, 2:12-CR-60-RL-PRC. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. Indiana Number: infdco20120622a58 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2012
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT JUAN MARTIN DEL CAMPO PAUL R. CHERRY, Magistrate Judge. Upon Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo's request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge Paul R. Cherry, on May 31, 2012, with the consent of Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo, counsel for Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo, and counsel for the United States
More

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON A PLEA OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT JUAN MARTIN DEL CAMPO

PAUL R. CHERRY, Magistrate Judge.

Upon Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo's request to enter a plea of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge Paul R. Cherry, on May 31, 2012, with the consent of Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo, counsel for Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo's plea of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo under oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of counsel for Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo understands the nature of the charge against him to which the plea is offered;

(2) that Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and his right against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo understands what the maximum possible sentence is, including the effect of the supervised release term, and Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the plea of guilty by Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo has been knowingly and voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo understands that his answers may later be used against him in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there is a factual basis for Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo's plea; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Juan Martin Del Campo's plea of guilty to the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and that Defendant Juan Martin Del Campo be adjudged guilty of the offense charged in Count 1 of the Indictment and have sentence imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Juan Martin Del Campo be adjudged guilty, a sentencing date before Senior Judge Rudy Lozano will be set by separate order. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

So ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer