THOMAS v. FRENCH, 4:12-CV-73. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. Indiana
Number: infdco20150114g13
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2015
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER RUDY LOZANO, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew P. Rodovich, filed on December 18, 2014 (DE #39). Judge Rodovich has recommended that this matter be dismissed because Plaintiff, Jessica Elizabeth Thomas, has displayed continuous contumacious conduct as described more fully in the body of the Report and Recommendation. In essence, Thomas has disregarded and failed to comply with this Court's orders despi
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER RUDY LOZANO, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew P. Rodovich, filed on December 18, 2014 (DE #39). Judge Rodovich has recommended that this matter be dismissed because Plaintiff, Jessica Elizabeth Thomas, has displayed continuous contumacious conduct as described more fully in the body of the Report and Recommendation. In essence, Thomas has disregarded and failed to comply with this Court's orders despit..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
RUDY LOZANO, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew P. Rodovich, filed on December 18, 2014 (DE #39). Judge Rodovich has recommended that this matter be dismissed because Plaintiff, Jessica Elizabeth Thomas, has displayed continuous contumacious conduct as described more fully in the body of the Report and Recommendation. In essence, Thomas has disregarded and failed to comply with this Court's orders despite repeated warnings of possible sanctions. The Report and Recommendation itself explains that the failure to file a timely objection to its contents will result in the waiver of the right to challenge it before this Court or the Court of Appeals. See Willis v. Caterpillar, Inc., 199 F.3d 902, 904 (1999). Neither party has filed an objection to date, and the time period for doing so has passed.
Therefore, upon due consideration, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (DE #39). Accordingly, this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The clerk is DIRECTED to close this case.
Source: Leagle
