JON E. DeGUILIO, District Judge.
The parties have filed an Amended Stipulation to settle all issues in this case [DE 32] (the "Proposed Stipulation"), as well as an Amended Joint Motion to set the matter for a fairness hearing and approve notice to the class members pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e). [DE 33] For the reasons stated herein, the Court will preliminarily approve the Proposed Stipulation and set the matter for a final approval hearing.
Plaintiff Emily Hizer, on her own behalf and on behalf of a class of those similarly situated, filed her complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act (the "ADA") and the Rehabilitation Act (the "RA") against Pulaski County, Indiana, on December 27, 2016. [DE 1] On September 11, 2017, the Court certified this case as a class action under Fed. R. Civ. P 23(a) and (b)(2), approving a plaintiff class defined as:
[DE 25] The Court further directed the parties to submit a proposed notice of certification for review and approval by November 27, 2017. [DE 25; DE 29] On November 27, the parties filed their original stipulation, joint motion for a fairness hearing, and proposed notice [DE 30; DE 31], but amended those documents shortly thereafter to reflect an adjusted timeline. [DE 32; DE 33 ¶ 1]
The underlying allegations have been set forth in the Court's September 11, 2017, Order, and need not be rehashed here. According to the current Proposed Stipulation, since the filing of this lawsuit, the County has adequately altered the public restrooms in the courthouse to make them fully compliant with the ADA and RA. [DE 32 ¶ 6] Plaintiffs agree that no further action need be taken with respect to the courthouse's restrooms. Id. The Proposed Stipulation further indicates that the County will install a new ADA- and RA-compliant elevator in the courthouse no later than September 30, 2018. Id. ¶ 7. In the meantime, the County will use its best efforts to keep the existing elevator in operation and will otherwise provide temporary accommodations for persons with physical disabilities who wish to make use of services or attend meetings held on the upper floors of the courthouse. Id. Upon the Court's final approval of this Proposed Stipulation, the County will pay Ms. Hizer $12,000, to be transferred to the ACLU of Indiana, a not-for-profit corporation, for attorneys' fees and costs accruing by the date of approval, or prior to June 30, 2018, whichever date is later. Id. ¶ 8. Once the elevator has been constructed and certified as compliant, the parties will file a joint motion to dismiss this case without prejudice. Id. ¶ 9. Attorneys for each side signed the Proposed Stipulation.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e) governs the voluntary dismissal of class actions:
Here, the Proposed Stipulation provides all of the injunctive relief sought in the class action complaint. [DE 1 at 13] This agreement appears to represent a fair, reasonable, and adequate compromise in light of the possibility of protracted litigation and disputed issues of liability.
The Court having reviewed the Proposed Stipulation and other submissions of the parties, and being otherwise fully advised, HEREBY ORDERS, pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that:
1. The representations, agreements, terms, and conditions of the parties' Proposed Stipulation to dismiss, as embodied in the Amended Stipulation [DE 32], are preliminarily approved pending a final fairness hearing.
2. As previously indicated, for purposes of this lawsuit, Class Members are defined as follows:
3. If for any reason the proposed stipulation ultimately does not become effective, the parties shall notify the Court and return to their respective positions in this lawsuit as those positions existed immediately before the parties executed the proposed stipulation. In such a scenario, the parties shall meet and confer in order to draft a proposed notice of certification and to submit said proposed notice to the Court for its review and approval. Nothing stated in the Proposed Stipulation or in this Order shall be deemed an admission or waiver of any kind by any of the parties or used as evidence against, or over the objection of, any party for any purpose in this action or in any other action or proceeding of any kind.
4. Having reviewed the parties' Joint Motion to Approve Form and Manner of Notice to Set Matter for Fairness Hearing [DE 33] and the attached proposed notice of hearing [DE 33-1], the Court hereby GRANTS the parties' Joint Motion, APPROVES the proposed notice (
5. The Court finds and determines that the notice of hearing given to Class Members in accordance with paragraph 4 herein constitutes the best notice practicable under the circumstances, constitutes due and sufficient notice of the matters set forth to all persons entitled to receive notice, and fully satisfies the requirements of due process and of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
6. A hearing will be held before The Honorable Jon E. DeGuilio, United States District Judge, in his first floor courtroom at the United States Courthouse, 204 S. Main Street, South Bend, Indiana, 46601 at
7.
8.
9. The parties entered into the Stipulation out of a desire to reach a settlement in this matter. By entering into this Stipulation the defendant does not concede any wrongdoing in this matter and it continues to deny wrongdoing. Plaintiffs stipulate that the County's entry into this Stipulation is not an admission of any kind and imposes no liability on defendant or any of its agents, employees, officers, or other persons for any violation of law except as set out herein solely for the purpose of compromising and settling disputed claims.
10. The Court reserves the right to adjourn or continue the Final Approval Hearing, and any adjournment or continuance may be without further notice of any kind other than oral announcement at the Final Approval Hearing or at any later hearing.
SO ORDERED.