Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Blair, 1:17-CR-61-TLS-PRC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Indiana Number: infdco20181004g18 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2018
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON PLEAS OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT DANURELL BLAIR PAUL R. CHERRY , Magistrate Judge . TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Upon Defendant Danurell Blair's request to enter pleas of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge Paul R. Cherry, on September 18, 2018, with the consent of Defendant Danurell Blair, counsel for Defenda
More

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON PLEAS OF GUILTY BY DEFENDANT DANURELL BLAIR

TO: THE HONORABLE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Upon Defendant Danurell Blair's request to enter pleas of guilty pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this matter came for hearing before Magistrate Judge Paul R. Cherry, on September 18, 2018, with the consent of Defendant Danurell Blair, counsel for Defendant Danurell Blair, and counsel for the United States of America.

The hearing on Defendant Danurell Blair's pleas of guilty was in full compliance with Rule 11, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, before the Magistrate Judge in open court and on the record.

In consideration of that hearing and the statements made by Danurell Blair under oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, the remarks of the Assistant United States Attorney and of counsel for Defendant Danurell Blair,

I FIND as follows:

(1) that Defendant Danurell Blair understands the nature of the charges against him to which the pleas are offered;

(2) that Defendant Danurell Blair understands his right to trial by jury, to persist in his pleas of not guilty, to the assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and against compelled self-incrimination;

(3) that Defendant Danurell Blair understands what the maximum possible sentences are, including the effect of the supervised release terms, and Defendant Danurell Blair understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances;

(4) that the pleas of guilty by Defendant Danurell Blair have been knowingly and voluntarily made and are not the result of force or threats or of promises;

(5) that Defendant Danurell Blair is competent to plead guilty;

(6) that Defendant Danurell Blair understands that his answers may later be used against him in a prosecution for perjury or false statement;

(7) that there are factual bases for Defendant Danurell Blair's pleas; and further,

I RECOMMEND that the Court accept Defendant Danurell Blair's pleas of guilty to the offenses charged in Counts 1 and 2 of the Superseding Indictment and that Defendant Danurell Blair be adjudged guilty of the offenses charged in Counts 1 and 2 of the Superseding Indictment and have sentences imposed. A Presentence Report has been ordered. Should this Report and Recommendation be accepted and Defendant Danurell Blair be adjudged guilty, a sentencing date before the presiding judge will be set by separate order. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen days. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer