United States v. Richardson, 3:19-CR-105 JD. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. Indiana
Number: infdco20200212783
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2020
Summary: ORDER JON E. DEGUILIO , District Judge . No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on January 24, 2020 [DE 21]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Jessie Wade Richardson's plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 1 of the Indictment in violation of 18 U.S.C. 875(c). Any objections a party submits to the probation officer in response to the draft Prese
Summary: ORDER JON E. DEGUILIO , District Judge . No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on January 24, 2020 [DE 21]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Jessie Wade Richardson's plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 1 of the Indictment in violation of 18 U.S.C. 875(c). Any objections a party submits to the probation officer in response to the draft Presen..
More
ORDER
JON E. DEGUILIO, District Judge.
No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's findings and recommendation upon a plea of guilty issued on January 24, 2020 [DE 21]. Accordingly, the court now ADOPTS those findings and recommendations, ACCEPTS defendant Jessie Wade Richardson's plea of guilty, and FINDS the defendant guilty of Count 1 of the Indictment in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c).
Any objections a party submits to the probation officer in response to the draft Presentence Report must specifically identify the basis of the objection and any supporting authority. Should the Addendum to the final Presentence Report reflect any outstanding objections by a party, that party must specifically state in its sentencing memorandum whether it maintains that objection. If so, the party must identify the basis and authority for its objection and, where applicable, any evidence the party expects to offer in support of that objection. The party should also state if, consistent with Rule 32(i)(3)(B), it does not believe a ruling on that objection will be necessary.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
