Whittington v. Colvin, 1:14-cv-01533-RLY-DML. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana
Number: infdco20160303935
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RICHARD L. YOUNG , Chief District Judge . James Whittington, Plaintiff, filed a request for judicial review of the decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, to terminate his disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 401 et seq. The court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge, who issued her Report and Recommendation. The Magistrat
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RICHARD L. YOUNG , Chief District Judge . James Whittington, Plaintiff, filed a request for judicial review of the decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, to terminate his disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 401 et seq. The court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge, who issued her Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate..
More
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RICHARD L. YOUNG, Chief District Judge.
James Whittington, Plaintiff, filed a request for judicial review of the decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, to terminate his disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. The court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge, who issued her Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge concluded that the Administrative Law Judge's ("ALJ") decision is supported by substantial evidence, and therefore recommended that the decision terminating benefits be upheld. Neither party objects. Consequently, the court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). After reviewing the record, the ALJ's decision, and the Report and Recommendation, this court is satisfied that the Magistrate Judge did not commit clear error. Therefore, the court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Filing No. 21) and AFFIRMS the decision of the ALJ.
SO ORDERED
Source: Leagle
