MIMMS v. CVS PHARMACY, INC., 1:15-cv-00970-TWP-MJD. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana
Number: infdco20170410749
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: ENTRY ON PARTIES' OBJECTIONS TO THE VIDEO TRIAL DEPOSITION OF CLINT THOMAS TANYA WALTON PRATT , District Judge . On March 24, 2017, the parties filed designations and objections to the video trial deposition of Clint Thomas. ( Filing No. 270 .) Plaintiff Anthony Mimms ("Dr. Mimms") objected to six portions of the video deposition and Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. ("CVS") objected to one portion. The Court makes the following rulings: • CVS's objection to section 85:21-90:18 is overruled. C
Summary: ENTRY ON PARTIES' OBJECTIONS TO THE VIDEO TRIAL DEPOSITION OF CLINT THOMAS TANYA WALTON PRATT , District Judge . On March 24, 2017, the parties filed designations and objections to the video trial deposition of Clint Thomas. ( Filing No. 270 .) Plaintiff Anthony Mimms ("Dr. Mimms") objected to six portions of the video deposition and Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. ("CVS") objected to one portion. The Court makes the following rulings: • CVS's objection to section 85:21-90:18 is overruled. CV..
More
ENTRY ON PARTIES' OBJECTIONS TO THE VIDEO TRIAL DEPOSITION OF CLINT THOMAS
TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge.
On March 24, 2017, the parties filed designations and objections to the video trial deposition of Clint Thomas. (Filing No. 270.) Plaintiff Anthony Mimms ("Dr. Mimms") objected to six portions of the video deposition and Defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. ("CVS") objected to one portion. The Court makes the following rulings:
• CVS's objection to section 85:21-90:18 is overruled. CVS objection goes to the weight, not the admissibility of this evidence.
• Dr. Mimms' objections with respect to sections 107:25-108:8, is overruled.
• Dr. Mimms objection with respect to section 112:23-114:1, is overruled to the extent the designated testimony refers to years 2013 through 2015.
• Dr. Mimms' objection to sections 118:22-123:14, is sustained.
• Dr. Mimms' objections with respect to sections 127:16-17 is overruled.
• Dr. Mimms' objections with respect to sections 128:25-129:1-7 is sustained; with respect to sections 129:8-15, the objection is overruled.
• Dr. Mimms' objections with respect to sections 132:3-9 is sustained.
Accordingly, the sustained portions of the deposition should be stricken from the video.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
