Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

I DIG BEST, INC. v. HARDPARTS DESIGN, LLC, 1:17-cv-03105-TWP-DML. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana Number: infdco20180124b96 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2018
Summary: Report and Recommendation of Dismissal DEBRA McVICKER LYNCH , Magistrate Judge . On December 13, 2017, the court ordered the plaintiff to show cause, in writing, by December 27, 2017, why its complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice because of its failure to serve the defendant within 90 days of the complaint's filing, as provided in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (Dkt. 7). To date, no response has been filed. The magistrate judge therefore recommends that this case be dismissed without p
More

Report and Recommendation of Dismissal

On December 13, 2017, the court ordered the plaintiff to show cause, in writing, by December 27, 2017, why its complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice because of its failure to serve the defendant within 90 days of the complaint's filing, as provided in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (Dkt. 7). To date, no response has been filed. The magistrate judge therefore recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice.

Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The failure to file objections within fourteen days after service will constitute a waiver of subsequent review absent a showing of good cause for that failure. Counsel should not anticipate any extension of this deadline or any other related briefing deadlines.

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer