Mines v. Galaxy International Purchasing, LLC, 1:17-cv-04746-RLY-DLP. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana
Number: infdco20190325986
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RICHARD L. YOUNG , District Judge . On December 27, 2007, Plaintiff, Anthony Mines, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated, filed a Class Action Complaint against the Defendants, Galaxy International Purchasing, LLC and Global Credit & Collection Corporation, alleging that they failed to identify the current creditor of his debt and the putative class members' debts in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Pract
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RICHARD L. YOUNG , District Judge . On December 27, 2007, Plaintiff, Anthony Mines, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated, filed a Class Action Complaint against the Defendants, Galaxy International Purchasing, LLC and Global Credit & Collection Corporation, alleging that they failed to identify the current creditor of his debt and the putative class members' debts in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practi..
More
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RICHARD L. YOUNG, District Judge.
On December 27, 2007, Plaintiff, Anthony Mines, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated, filed a Class Action Complaint against the Defendants, Galaxy International Purchasing, LLC and Global Credit & Collection Corporation, alleging that they failed to identify the current creditor of his debt and the putative class members' debts in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. On April 5, 2018, Defendants filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Case. The court referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge, who issued her Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the court grant Defendants' motion. Neither party objects. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). The court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and finds no clear error. Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Filing No. 49) and GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Compel and Stay Case (Filing No. 26). This action is STAYED pending completion of the arbitration pursuant to the terms of the Arbitration Provision at issue.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
