Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ellis, 3:04-cr-0022-RLY-MPB-01. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana Number: infdco20191223b80 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DORIS L. PRYOR , Magistrate Judge . On December 20, 2019, the Court held a hearing on the Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on December 17, 2019. Defendant Ellis appeared in person with his appointed counsel Dominic Martin. The government appeared by Brad Blackington, Assistant United States Attorney. U. S. Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Jason Phillips. The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Fed
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On December 20, 2019, the Court held a hearing on the Petition for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on December 17, 2019. Defendant Ellis appeared in person with his appointed counsel Dominic Martin. The government appeared by Brad Blackington, Assistant United States Attorney. U. S. Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Jason Phillips.

The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:

1. The Court advised Defendant Ellis of his rights and provided him with a copy of the petition. Defendant Ellis orally waived his right to a preliminary hearing. 2. After being placed under oath, Defendant Ellis admitted violation number 1. [Docket No. 17.] 3. The allegations to which Defendant admitted, as fully set forth in the petition, are: Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance 1 "You must refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance." The offender tested positive for amphetamines on the following dates: April 15, July 29, November 20, November 25, December 5, and December 9, 2019. On November 25, 2019, the offender tested positive for Oxycodone; however, his last Oxycodone prescription was from October 29, 2019. On December 9, 2019, the offender tested positive for opiates.

4. The parties stipulated that:

(a) The highest grade of violation is a Grade B violation. (b) Defendant's criminal history category is IV. (c) The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation of supervised release, therefore, is 12 to 18 months' imprisonment.

5. The parties jointly recommended a sentence of one (1) day with no supervised release to follow.

The Magistrate Judge, having considered the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and as more fully set forth on the record, finds that the Defendant violated the conditions in the petition, that his supervised release should be revoked, and that he should be sentenced to the custody of the Attorney General or his designee for a period of one (1) day with no supervised release to follow. The Defendant is to be released pending the District Judge's action on this Report and Recommendation.

The parties are hereby notified that the District Judge may reconsider any matter assigned to a Magistrate Judge. The parties waived the fourteen-day period to object to the Report and Recommendation.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer