F.F.T., LLC v. Sexton, 1:19-cv-03027-RLY-MJD. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana
Number: infdco20200312a57
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2020
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RICHARD L. YOUNG , District Judge . On February 14, 2020, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Report and Recommendation, recommending the court deny Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal and to Strike Irrelevant Exhibits to Amended Complaint. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this court to file objections; none were filed. The court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereb
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RICHARD L. YOUNG , District Judge . On February 14, 2020, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Report and Recommendation, recommending the court deny Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal and to Strike Irrelevant Exhibits to Amended Complaint. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this court to file objections; none were filed. The court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RICHARD L. YOUNG, District Judge.
On February 14, 2020, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Report and Recommendation, recommending the court deny Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal and to Strike Irrelevant Exhibits to Amended Complaint. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this court to file objections; none were filed. The court, having considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal and to Strike Irrelevant Exhibits to Amended Complaint (Filing No. 42) is hereby DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
