Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hodges v. . Moore, (1793)

Court: Court of King's Bench Number:  Visitors: 9
Judges: CREW, C. J.
Filed: Jul. 05, 1793
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: It is disallowed. He ought to have brought a writ of privilege, and might be relieved that way. When Thorpe was Speaker of the Parliament, he had a supersedeas for all actions; it was held bad. He ought to have had a supersedeas for every action.

Let him throw himself on the justice of the court; and as Parliament stand to their privileges, so do we to ours. In any case they may restrain the parties or their counsels, but never the court, who are not bound to take notice of it without special writ. And the parties who prosecute do it at their peril.

Noy said that in M. 12, E., 4, in the pleas of the Exchequer, there is an excellent precedent, on the learning respecting the privilege of Parliament. Antea, p. 663; Bendl., 184; Noy, 83.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer